description Argument Wars Overview
Argument Wars is an educational browser game developed by iCivics, an organization founded by former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Released around 2010, the game casts students as attorneys representing either side of actual landmark Supreme Court cases, such as Brown v. Board of Education.
Players must analyze constitutional principles and select matching evidence to build logical arguments and convince the presiding judge to rule in their favor.
help Argument Wars FAQ
Which Supreme Court cases can you argue in Argument Wars?
The iCivics game includes Brown v. Board of Education, Gideon v. Wainwright, Miranda v. Arizona and Texas v. Johnson. Other available disputes include Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, New Jersey v. T.L.O. and Snyder v. Phelps.
How do you win a case in Argument Wars?
The player chooses one side, identifies the relevant constitutional basis and selects arguments that support the position. Strong reasoning damages the opposing side's case, while irrelevant or weak claims provide less persuasive force.
Does Argument Wars recreate the real Supreme Court outcome?
No, iCivics explicitly describes it as a simulation rather than a reenactment. The player's choices determine the in-game result, after which the game explains how the actual justices ruled.
Can Argument Wars be played on a tablet or in Spanish?
It is available through a web browser and is listed by iCivics for tablet and iPad use. The game also offers a Spanish-language version, English voiceover and a contextual glossary.
explore Explore More
Similar to Argument Wars
ui.x_see_all arrow_forward
Reviews & Comments
Write a Review
Be the first to review
Share your thoughts with the community and help others make better decisions.
